Critics give To All Trains a B-Side Breakdown of 84 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 75 to 100.
The verdict on To All Trains
8 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 Louder Than War
- Lowest 75 Spin
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Shellac's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of At Action Park (81). The third best-reviewed Rock album of 2024 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louder Than War via Wikipediaby John Robb | 5/5 | 100 | 2024 | “Shellac 'To All Trains' album review 'as starkly minimalistic and darkly funny and as ever and a reminder of” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 9/10 | 90 | 2024 | |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipediaby Simon K | 4.2/5 | 84 | 2024 | “Shellac – To All Trains review: I didn’t notice, your hair is really great.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Christopher R. Weingarten | 8.1/10 | 81 | 2024 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Grayson Haver Currin | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “Trio deliver a suitably seismic swan song for the late producer on final album, To All Trains.” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Olly Thomas | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “The late Steve Albini’s legendary power trio Shellac bring the noise (rock) one last time…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Spin via Wikipediaby Raymond Cummings | B+ | 75 | 2024 | “Noise-rock giants Shellac lock in one last time on 'To All Trains,' their leanest LP.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
To All Trains in Shellac's catalog
How these critics usually treat Shellac
- AllMusic Harsher than usual4 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Shellac's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork Harsher than usual3 points below the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Shellac's other albums (3).
More from Shellac
More Rock from around 2024
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply