Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 25 to 88.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 25 (Los Angeles Times) to 88 (Entertainment Weekly). Only one of 10 critics liked it: Entertainment Weekly, at 88.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B+ | 88 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Michaelangelo Matos | C- | 71 | 2009 | |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Ben Hogwood | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2009 | “Listening to Chris Cornell's third solo album is like being dealt a hand in a game of musical happy families. First card: Mr Cornell of Seattle, vocalist.” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2008 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby David Marchese | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2009 | “Produced with a heavy hand by Timbaland, the third solo album from ex-Soundgarden and Audioslave singer Chris Cornell is strangely appealing in its” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 2.5/5 | 50 | 2008 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Christian Hoard | 2/5 | 40 | ||
| NME via Wikipedia | 4/10 | 40 | 2009 | “Facts about this album: * Chris Cornell was formerly singer with grunge legends Soundgarden and rock supergroup Audioslave. * ‘Scream’ is produced by hip-hop behemoth Timbaland. Album review: Rock and…” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Bill Stewart | 3/10 | 30 | 2009 | “There are still people out there who don't take popular music seriously. To them, it's something frivolous and simplistic, pleasant in the same crude and” |
| Los Angeles Times via Wikipedia | 1/4 | 25 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Chris Cornell
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply