Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 91.
By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Brand New's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Deja Entendu (82). 8 of 9 critics liked it, with Exclaim! the lone holdout at 70.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Michelle Geslani | A- | 91 | 2017 | “Long Island rockers reinvent themselves while also recapturing the essence of what’s made them so enduring.” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Nathan Westley | 9/10 | 90 | 2017 | “Science Fiction is one of the rock albums of the year, and if it is the case – as is rumoured – that it's Brand New's last, then it's also…” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby David Anthony | B+ | 88 | 2017 | “Brand New writes its own eulogy with Science Fiction” |
| Pitchforkby Ian Cohen | 8.3/10 | 83 | 2017 | “Brand New’s fifth album stands as a monument to their gradual evolution. It is a wise and vulnerable conclusion for a rock band who were crucial in shaping a scene,…” |
| Q via Wikipediaby George Garner | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Emma Johnston | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Farewell album from Long Island alt.rockers” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby DiS Archive | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “A record that values thinking over feeling and challenges its listener to do the same” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Timothy Monger | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Ian Gormely | 7/10 | 70 | 2017 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Brand New
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply