More

Pulp – More: B-Side Breakdown 81 (B-) from 15 critic reviews.

Album cover for More by Pulp
Released June 6, 2025
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Pulp

More

81
B-Side BreakdownGrade B- · 15 critics · 87% approval
B-Side Breakdown81Grade: B-
Approval87%13 of 15 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Critics give More a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 15 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.

The verdict on More

13 of 15 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.

020406080100PopMatters: 50Northern Transmissions: 60Pitchfork: 75Beats Per Minute: 76Record Collector: 80Rolling Stone: 80Mojo: 80The Guardian: 80Exclaim!: 80musicOMH: 90The Line of Best Fit: 90Clash: 90AllMusic: 90Cult Following: 100Spill Magazine: 100 Breakdown 81
The gist
Cult Followingby Ewan Gleadow 5/5 100 Jun 2, 2025 “Pulp return with their first studio album in twenty-four years, and learn from their past on More, a high point for Jarvis Cocker and the gang.”
Spill Magazineby Joseph Mastel 10/10 100 Jun 6, 2025 “PULP MORE ROUGH TRADE RECORDS Britpop legends Pulp have finally returned with More, their first album in 24 years. The long stretch between records is no problem. Jarvis Cocker and…”
musicOMH via Wikipediaby John Murphy 4.5/5 90 Jun 3, 2025 “So THIS is what they do for an encore”
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Luke Winstanley 9/10 90 Jun 4, 2025 “Let us celebrate More for what it is: a surprisingly thoughtful and often breathtaking coda to Pulp’s wonderful career.”
Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray 9/10 90 Jun 5, 2025 “Some things just take time. The perfect brew, for example, isn’t to be hurried. Such is the case with new Pulp albums. Famously, the Sheffield band hold”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares 4.5/5 90
Record Collector via Wikipediaby Peter Barry 4/5 80 May 19, 2025 “What happens to them all? The mis-shapes, mistakes and misfits? The revenge-obsessed, randy amateur spies? The legendary girlfriends? The stragglers”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Maura Johnston 4/5 80 Jun 6, 2025
Mojo via Wikipediaby John Mulvey 4/5 80 Jun 6, 2025 “With their first album in 24 years, Jarvis Cocker and co. deliver one of their finest set of songs of their career. MOJO's John Mulvey begs for more…”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis 4/5 80 Jun 2, 2025 “Jarvis Cocker and the band’s first album in 24 years delivers a refreshing take on middle age, with all the the skewed observation and joyful melodic flourishes of old”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Luke Pearson 8/10 80 Jun 2, 2025
Beats Per Minuteby John Wohlmacher 76% 76 Jun 9, 2025 “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s”
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mina Tavakoli 7.5/10 75 Jun 10, 2025
Northern Transmissionsby Hannah Harlacher 6/10 60 May 29, 2025
PopMatters 5/10 50 Jun 23, 2025 “What Pulp haven't lost is their innate Englishness: ballads recall grocery shops, summer festivals, and farmers' markets, but the results are disappointing.”

More in Pulp's catalog

75It (1983): 4646Freaks (1987): 5050Separations (1992): 6262His ‘n’ Hers (1994): 7777Different Class (1995): 8686This Is Hardcore (1998): 8383We Love Life (2001): 8484More (2025): 8181This one1983
Pulp's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Pulp album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Pulp

  • Pitchfork Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Pulp's other albums (5).
  • Rolling Stone Kinder than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points below on Pulp's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Pulp's other albums (6).

From B-Side Guys

More from Pulp

See all Pulp albums ranked

More Rock from around 2025

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply