Critics give More a B-Side Breakdown of 81 (B-), from 15 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.
The verdict on More
13 of 15 critics liked it, with some disagreement on how much.
- Highest 100 Cult Following and Spill Magazine
- Lowest 50 PopMatters
- Career #4 of Pulp's 8 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Pulp's best-reviewed album here since We Love Life (2001). The fourth best-reviewed Rock album of 2025 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cult Followingby Ewan Gleadow | 5/5 | 100 | Jun 2, 2025 | “Pulp return with their first studio album in twenty-four years, and learn from their past on More, a high point for Jarvis Cocker and the gang.” |
| Spill Magazineby Joseph Mastel | 10/10 | 100 | Jun 6, 2025 | “PULP MORE ROUGH TRADE RECORDS Britpop legends Pulp have finally returned with More, their first album in 24 years. The long stretch between records is no problem. Jarvis Cocker and…” |
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby John Murphy | 4.5/5 | 90 | Jun 3, 2025 | “So THIS is what they do for an encore” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Luke Winstanley | 9/10 | 90 | Jun 4, 2025 | “Let us celebrate More for what it is: a surprisingly thoughtful and often breathtaking coda to Pulp’s wonderful career.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 9/10 | 90 | Jun 5, 2025 | “Some things just take time. The perfect brew, for example, isn’t to be hurried. Such is the case with new Pulp albums. Famously, the Sheffield band hold” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Peter Barry | 4/5 | 80 | May 19, 2025 | “What happens to them all? The mis-shapes, mistakes and misfits? The revenge-obsessed, randy amateur spies? The legendary girlfriends? The stragglers” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Maura Johnston | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 6, 2025 | |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby John Mulvey | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 6, 2025 | “With their first album in 24 years, Jarvis Cocker and co. deliver one of their finest set of songs of their career. MOJO's John Mulvey begs for more…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | Jun 2, 2025 | “Jarvis Cocker and the band’s first album in 24 years delivers a refreshing take on middle age, with all the the skewed observation and joyful melodic flourishes of old” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Luke Pearson | 8/10 | 80 | Jun 2, 2025 | |
| Beats Per Minuteby John Wohlmacher | 76% | 76 | Jun 9, 2025 | “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Mina Tavakoli | 7.5/10 | 75 | Jun 10, 2025 | |
| Northern Transmissionsby Hannah Harlacher | 6/10 | 60 | May 29, 2025 | |
| PopMatters | 5/10 | 50 | Jun 23, 2025 | “What Pulp haven't lost is their innate Englishness: ballads recall grocery shops, summer festivals, and farmers' markets, but the results are disappointing.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More in Pulp's catalog
How these critics usually treat Pulp
- Pitchfork Harsher than usual7 points below the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Pulp's other albums (5).
- Rolling Stone Kinder than usual2 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points below on Pulp's other albums (3).
- AllMusic About usual for them9 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Pulp's other albums (6).
From B-Side Guys
More from Pulp
More Rock from around 2025
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply