Early reviews. Critics give The Desaturating Seven an early B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on The Desaturating Seven
4 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 85 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 60 AllMusic
- Career #2 of Primus's 8 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Primus's best-reviewed album here since Sailing the Seas of Cheese (1991).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Nina Corcoran | B | 85 | 2017 | “Primus’ new album about rainbow goblins is somehow its most digestible” |
| Record Collectorby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “Evil-minded goblins are intent on stealing all the world’s colour. This is an important assimilation if you’re to enjoy the new Primus album to its” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Chris Conaton | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “Drummer Tim Alexander has drifted out of and back into Primus many times over the past two decades. He rejoined the band in the studio (for the first time in” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | C+ | 78 | 2017 | “The return of the band's early '90s lineup results in an EP dressed in concept album clothes.” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Alan Ranta | 7/10 | 70 | 2017 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Yeung | 3/5 | 60 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The Desaturating Seven in Primus's catalog
How these critics usually treat Primus
- AllMusic Harsher than usual19 points below the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on Primus's other albums (7).
More from Primus
← Earlier Primus & the Chocolate Factory with the Fungi Ensemble (2014)
More Rock from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply