Early reviews. Critics give Where Greater Men Have Fallen an early B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Where Greater Men Have Fallen
So far, 2 of 3 critics liked it.
- Highest 80 Metal Temple
- Lowest 70 Rolling Stone
- Career #2 of Primordial's 2 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Primordial's best-reviewed album here since Redemption at the Puritan’s Hand (2011).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Temple | 8/10 | 80 | 2014 | “To break the ice, let me inform you when I was told this band was a Black/Folk Metal mix I was expecting something much different. PRIMORDIAL being a band I…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Grayson Haver Currin | 7.9/10 | 79 | 2014 | “The excellent eighth album from Irish metal stalwarts Primordial finds Alan Averill, already one of metal's most compelling vocalists, tapping into a new, soulful potency. For a band that’s always…” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Kim Kelly | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2014 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Where Greater Men Have Fallen on Rolling Stone.com.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Primordial
More Metal & Punk from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply