Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 90.
By the numbers: 7 of 10 critics liked it.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Cam Lindsay | 9/10 | 90 | 2015 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 8.5/10 | 85 | 2015 | “Viet Cong's impressive full-length debut consists of dark, simmering post-punk. Their mission is not altogether different from that of [Women](http://pitchfork.com/artists/26456-women), the short-lived and sorely missed indie deconstructionists in which half…” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Nina Corcoran | B- | 81 | 2015 | “Up-and-coming post-punk quartet make a memorable debut with their self-titled LP.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Jeremy D. Larson | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “8SPIN Rating: 8 of 10Release Date: January 20, 2015Label: Jagjaguwar/Flemish EyeWhile waiting for "Death," the 11-minute reckoning that closes their first” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | “At first, Viet Cong’s debut appears to be coming from a dark place. “If we’re lucky we’ll get old and die” sings bassist Matt Flegel on ‘Pointless Experience’, but context…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Lanre Bakare | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “Calgary’s Viet Cong connect the dots between experimental noise and indie rock with some skill, writes Lanre Bakare” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Paula Mejía | 3/5 | 60 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Viet Cong on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Rock from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply