Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: Porcupine Tree's best-reviewed album here since Fear of a Blank Planet (2007).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonic Perspectivesby Scott Medina | 9.1/10 | 91 | 2022 | “You wanted it, you got it. Sure, it might have taken a decade longer than hoped for but – as Steven Wilson himself has mused – the legend of Porcupine…” |
| Record Collectorby Peter Barry | 4/5 | 80 | 2022 | “Over a long decade for close followers of Porcupine Tree, something was ticking away behind frontman Steven Wilson’s evasive interview manoeuvres. While” |
| Spectrum Cultureby John Garratt | 80/100 | 80 | 2022 | “After a 13-year wait, this is not a product made for old time’s sake – it is a vital, breathing work, exploring the gaps between extremes posed by the band…” |
| XS Noizeby Michael Barron | 7/10 | 70 | 2022 | “As late as 2018, when Porcupine Tree frontman and founder Steven Wilson was asked about the band's chances of reunion, he responded, "Honestly, I would say” |
| Pitchforkby Brad Sanders | 6.9/10 | 69 | 2022 | |
| Slantby Steve Erickson | 3/5 | 60 | 2022 | “Porcupine Tree’s 11th studio album, 'Closure/Continuation', implies a summary of a body of work running back 35 years.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Porcupine Tree
More Rock from around 2022
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply