Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 59 to 80.
By the numbers: 3 of 8 critics liked it.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slant via Wikipediaby Brian Schiller | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | “Everyone into Position would sound right at home in the middle of the grunge-metal of the early ’90s.” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2005 | |
| No Ripcord via Wikipedia | 8/10 | 80 | “I fell out of love with The Rock a while back. Not the wrestler-turned-actor, you understand, the musical format. I gave up on it when the meatheads took over the…” | |
| PopMatters via Wikipedia | 7/10 | 70 | 2006 | “For the past few years, the sound of British rock has been accurately described by adjectives such as fey or twee — the kind of words that conjure images of” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby DiS Archive | 7/10 | 70 | 2005 | “After the release of their debut, rumour had it that Oceansize would return with a bold collection of tight, hook-laden numbers in a bid to fully c…” |
| Alternative Press via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2005 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Cory D. Byrom | 5.9/10 | 59 | 2006 | “Indie band stitches together a patchwork of styles– alternative rock, riff-heavy modern hardcore, ethereal post rock, scream-filled metal– on its second LP.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Oceansize
More Indie & Alternative from around 2005
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply