Based on 12 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 30 to 88.
By the numbers: Scores ran from 30 (Spin) to 88 (Entertainment Weekly).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B+ | 88 | ||
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Oliver Sava | C | 75 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| PopMatters | 7/10 | 70 | “Success at the register as it may have been, Rolling Papers feels even more out of place in Wiz Khalifa's ever-expansive discography after just one year than” | |
| RapReviews | 7/10 | 70 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jody Rosen | 3/5 | 60 | 2012 | “Check out our album review of Artist's O.N.I.F.C. on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | ||
| Spectrum Culture | 3.0/5 | 60 | “[xrr rating=2.75/5]Pinpointing exactly where Pittsburgh rapper Wiz Khalifa falls on the hip-hop map has become a bit of a challenge in recent years. His 2010 single “Black and Yellow” became…” | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jordan Sargent | 4.8/10 | 48 | 2012 | “Wiz Khalifa smokes weed by the acre, but his career to date has been driven by his own shrewd vision for himself. O.N.I.F.C., his second major label album, is the…” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alex Macpherson | 2/5 | 40 | 2012 | “Pittsburgh rapper Wiz Khalifa comes across as a serviceable but limited artist on his new album, writes Alex Macpherson” |
| NME via Wikipedia | 4/10 | 40 | ||
| Slant | 2/5 | 40 | “The album’s flaws have less to do with Khalifa’s ego and more with the dumb, reflexive materialism of the lyrics.” | |
| Spinby Dan Weiss | 3/10 | 30 | 2012 | “3SPIN Rating: 3 of 10Release Date: December 04, 2012Label: Rostrum/AtlanticJust because something embodies the laid-back vibes of "weed rap" doesn't mean” |
More from Wiz Khalifa
More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 2012
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply