Toast

Neil Young and Crazy Horse – Toast: B-Side Breakdown 79 (C+) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Toast by Neil Young and Crazy Horse
Released July 8, 2022
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Neil Young and Crazy Horse

Toast

79
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 7 critics · 57% approval
B-Side Breakdown79Grade: C+
Approval57%4 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 28 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Neil Young and Crazy Horse's best-reviewed album here since Ragged Glory (1990). Scores ran from 60 (Clash) to 100 (The Telegraph).

020406080100Clash: 60Pitchfork: 63AllMusic: 70The Arts Desk: 80Uncut: 90Under the Radar: 90The Telegraph: 100 Breakdown 79
The gist
The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick 5/5 100
Uncut via Wikipediaby Michael Bonner 4.5/5 90
Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Michael James Hall 9/10 90 “In 2001 Neil Young chose to sideline the newly recorded Toast in favor of 2002’s shabby, soul-inspired Are You Passionate?”
The Arts Desk via Wikipediaby Nick Hasted 4/5 80 “Neil Young put Toast to one side in 2001, dismayed at its blue emotional terrain. Depicting his marriage to Pegi Young hanging by a thread, it was recorded with Crazy…”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Fred Thomas 3.5/5 70
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Andy Cush 6.3/10 63 2022
Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray 6/10 60 2022 “It feels like Neil Young is having a bit of a spring clean – musically speaking, at least. He’s delving into his seemingly never-ending archive, releasing”

More from Neil Young and Crazy Horse

See all Neil Young and Crazy Horse albums ranked

More Rock from around 2022

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply