+ –

Mew – + –: B-Side Breakdown 77 (C+) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for + – by Mew
Released April 21, 2015
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Mew

+ –

77
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 10 critics · 60% approval
B-Side Breakdown77Grade: C+
Approval60%6 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 10 points of each other

Critics give + – a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (C+), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 85.

The verdict on + –

6 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100NME: 70The Line of Best Fit: 70Drowned in Sound: 70Pitchfork: 72PopMatters: 80musicOMH: 80Exclaim!: 80DIY: 80AllMusic: 80Consequence: 85 Breakdown 77
The gist
Consequence via Wikipediaby Nina Corcoran B 85 2015 “Danish art rockers return with spacious pop that highlights the dreaminess of prog.”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Jordan Blum 8/10 80 2015 “Ever since they broke onto the scene almost 20 years ago with their delightful debut, A Triumph for Man, the Danish quartet Mew have proven to be among the”
musicOMH via Wikipediaby Christopher Monk 4/5 80 2015 “Denmark’s Mew are justly adored by a small but loyal band of followers off the back of an excellent brace of albums in the mid-noughties: 2003’s Frengers”
Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Luke-Julius Frenette 8/10 80 2015
DIY via Wikipediaby Sarah Jamieson 4/5 80 2015 “Mew have always been unpredictable, and with ‘+-’ they prove, once again, that it’s all for the best.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby James Christopher Monger 4/5 80 2015
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 7.2/10 72 2015 “The blinding, gilded tone of +- is charming rather than obnoxious because Mew never use their exquisite and excessive tastes to glorify themselves as rock overlords. Their songs continue to…”
NME via Wikipediaby Rhian Daly 7/10 70 2015 “You know about the big releases each week, but what about those smaller albums which may have passed underneath your radar. Don’t miss out on the smaller, lesser-known gems which…”
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Laurence Day 7/10 70 2015 “The Danish legends lead us on a whistle-stop tour of their roots for album six, in their mission to explore the future.”
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Haydon Spenceley 7/10 70 2015 “It’s not a return to form. They never lost it”

+ – in Mew's catalog

75Frengers (2003): 8888And the Glass Handed Kites (2005): 8282No More Stories… (2009): 8383+ – (2015): 7777This one2003
Mew's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Mew album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Mew

  • Drowned in Sound About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Mew's other albums (3).
  • AllMusic About usual for them4 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Mew's other albums (3).

More from Mew

See all Mew albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2015

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply