Early reviews. Critics give Risk to Exist an early B-Side Breakdown of 70 (Keeper), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Risk to Exist
4 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 Clash and Drowned in Sound
- Lowest 60 PopMatters and NME
- Career #3 of Maxïmo Park's 7 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “Having made their name thanks to their trademark angular and heartfelt pop music, that Maxïmo Park’s sixth LP ‘Risk to Exist” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Paul Brown | 8/10 | 80 | 2017 | “It feels like a mission statement for a band who deserve the utmost credit for using their platform to stand up so vehemently for their beliefs” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Scott Riby | 7/10 | 70 | 2017 | “Risk To Exist reveals Maxïmo Park in a new light, and is a step in the right direction.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Juan Edgardo Rodríguez | 6/10 | 60 | 2017 | “Maximo Park are no strangers to vocalizing their thoughts about the current state of affairs. The Newcastle upon Tyne band openly explored the troubling” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 | “Indie-rock veterans go disco on a lively but meek protest album” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Risk to Exist in Maxïmo Park's catalog
How these critics usually treat Maxïmo Park
- NME Harsher than usual12 points below the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Maxïmo Park's other albums (6).
- PopMatters Harsher than usual12 points below the other critics here. Usually 3 points below on Maxïmo Park's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for themLevel with the other critics here. Usually 7 points above on Maxïmo Park's other albums (5).
More from Maxïmo Park
← Earlier Too Much Information (2014)Later → Nature Always Wins (2021)
More Rock from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply