Critics give The London Sessions a B-Side Breakdown of 69 (Mixed Bag), from 11 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 80.
The verdict on The London Sessions
Most critics liked it: 8 of 11 liked it.
- Highest 80 RapReviews, The Telegraph and AllMusic
- Outlier 40 PopMatters, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #8 of Mary J. Blige's 14 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RapReviews | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Kyle Anderson | B+ | 75 | 2014 | |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Brennan Carley | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: December 02, 2014Label: CapitolOver the past decade, Mary J. Blige has proven her ability to cloak herself in the” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Chuck Arnold | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2014 | “Check out our album review of Artist's The London Sessions on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jordan Sargent | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | “The R&B legend's new album features collaborations with Disclosure as well as British pop figures like Sam Smith, Naughty Boy, and "Latch" songwriter Jimmy Napes. But the young producers are…” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Angus Batey | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | “In February, Disclosure released a remix of their ‘F For You’ single featuring Mary J Blige on vocals. Guy and Howard Lawrence had a powerful effect on the New York…” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Eric Henderson | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 | “The London Sessions announces itself in its very title as a jaunt outside of Blige’s comfort zone.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tim Jonze | 3/5 | 60 | 2014 | “Recording with everyone from Emeli Sandé to Sam Smith, the American R&B star chases the sound of young London on her latest album, writes Tim Jonze” |
| PopMattersby Colin McGuire | 4/10 | 40 | 2014 | “She also said that she'd been waiting for someone to write with and fill exactly what she was looking for in terms of production and the beat. And then once” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
The London Sessions in Mary J. Blige's catalog
How these critics usually treat Mary J. Blige
- The Guardian About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Mary J. Blige's other albums (7).
- Entertainment Weekly About usual for them7 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Mary J. Blige's other albums (10).
- AllMusic About usual for them13 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Mary J. Blige's other albums (12).
- NME About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Mary J. Blige's other albums (5).
- Slant About usual for them10 points below the other critics here. Usually 6 points below on Mary J. Blige's other albums (6).
- Pitchfork About usual for them2 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Mary J. Blige's other albums (4).
More from Mary J. Blige
← Earlier A Mary Christmas (2013)Later → Strength of a Woman (2017)
More R&B & Soul from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply