Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
By the numbers: 7 of 9 critics liked it.
| The gist | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Annie Zaleski | A- | 91 | “Taylor Swift is done proving herself on the resonant Lover” |
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Larry Fitzmaurice | B+ | 88 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Nick Levine | 4/5 | 80 | “On her seventh album, the pop mega-force leaves behind the anger that fuelled its predecessor, instead opting for open-hearted love songs” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Nick Catucci | 4/5 | 80 | “Nick Catucci reviews Taylor Swift's 'Lover' album: She reaches new heights of personal and musical liberation on 7th studio album.” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Alexandra Pollard | 4/5 | 80 | “Swift’s seventh album feels like a partial resurrection of the Swift of old: moony romance and earnest earworms abound” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine | 4/5 | 80 | |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Anna Gaca | 7.1/10 | 71 | “On her seventh album, Taylor Swift is a little wiser and a lot more in love. Though uneven, Lover is a bright, fun album with great emotional honesty.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 3/5 | 60 | “Less bitter than Reputation, Lover has something for everyone, especially Swift’s boyfriend, but is she treading water?” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
From B-Side Guys
- More on Taylor SwiftStrutman Lane – “Lavender Haze” (Taylor Swift Cover): A Funky Fresh Take
More from Taylor Swift
More Pop from around 2019
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply