Critics give Romance Is Boring a B-Side Breakdown of 77 (Keeper), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 90.
The verdict on Romance Is Boring
Most critics liked it: 9 of 10 liked it.
- Highest 90 PopMatters and DIY
- Outlier 50 AllMusic, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #4 of Los Campesinos!'s 5 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Jordan Sargent | 9/10 | 90 | 2010 | “As a thesis statement for Los Campesinos!’s third album, “romance is boring” is, if not an outright lie, then at the very least a red herring. After all, lead” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Gareth O'Malley | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2010 | “They’re well capable of a flawless release. Whether that comes in the form of a ‘record’ or an album proper is irrelevant: if any band can do it, this lot…” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Paul Thompson | 8.3/10 | 83 | 2010 | “The divisive and highly personal Welsh group continues to grow up, embrace its inner punk, churn out amazing lyrics, and sharpen its edge.” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Emily Mackay | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “If you’ve ever spent a pained afternoon concocting a mixtape that you’ll never send, or an increasingly drunken evening watching the object of your affections resolutely ignore your existence, then…” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Simon Jay-Catling | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “Romance is Boring marks the tipping point when self-absorbent adolescent relationships and emotions become the things used to cower behind as escap…” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Anne Hollowday | 8/10 | 80 | 2010 | “Having toured America several times, becoming a surprise success story in the process, Los Campesinos! return with their full-length follow-up to ‘We Are Beautiful, We Are Doomed’.” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Philip Cosores | 4/5 | 80 | 2010 | “On a record full of angst, death, f#@%ing, fighting, football, breakups, and hookups, romance is anything but dull.” |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Evan Rytlewski | 7/10 | 70 | 2010 | “Los Campesinos!'s new release, Romance is Boring, is the inevitable realization that even stable relationships don't make sex any less elusive.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Josh Modell | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2009 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Tim Sendra | 2.5/5 | 50 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Romance Is Boring in Los Campesinos!'s catalog
How these critics usually treat Los Campesinos!
- AllMusic Harsher than usual30 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Los Campesinos!'s other albums (4).
- Spin Harsher than usual8 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Los Campesinos!'s other albums (3).
- Pitchfork About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 3 points above on Los Campesinos!'s other albums (4).
More from Los Campesinos!
← Earlier We Are Beautiful, We Are Doomed (2008)Later → Hello Sadness (2011)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2009
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply