Californian Soil

London Grammar – Californian Soil: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Californian Soil by London Grammar
Released March 3, 2021
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
London Grammar

Californian Soil

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 10 critics · 70% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval70%7 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 30 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 90.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of London Grammar's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Truth Is a Beautiful Thing (71). Scores ran from 40 (Slant) to 90 (The Line of Best Fit).

020406080100Slant: 40The Guardian: 60Pitchfork: 62Under the Radar: 80The Independent: 80NME: 80Clash: 80The Telegraph: 80The Line of Best Fit: 90AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 74
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Christopher Hamilton-Peach 9/10 90 2021
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Z. Yeung 4.5/5 90
Under the Radar via Wikipediaby Andy Von Pip 8/10 80
The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown 4/5 80 2021
NME via Wikipediaby Hannah Mylrea 4/5 80 2021
Clash via Wikipediaby Dave Beech 8/10 80 2021
The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Hannah Jocelyn 6.2/10 62 2021
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alim Kheraj 3/5 60 2021
Slant via Wikipediaby Charles Lyons-Burt 2/5 40 2021

More from London Grammar

See all London Grammar albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2021

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply