Locked Down

Dr. John – Locked Down: B-Side Breakdown 85 (B) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Locked Down by Dr. John
Released April 3, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Dr. John

Locked Down

85
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 9 critics · 89% approval
B-Side Breakdown85Grade: B
Approval89%8 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 100.

By the numbers: The fourth best-reviewed album of 2012 we've tracked. 8 of 9 critics liked it, with Consequence the lone holdout at 70.

020406080100Consequence: 70Pitchfork: 75Rolling Stone: 80Clash: 80AllMusic: 80Paste: 90Entertainment Weekly: 91The Guardian: 100Los Angeles Times: 100 Breakdown 85
The gist
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson 5/5 100 2012 “The collaboration with the Black Keys' Dan Auerbach is an inspired way to update Dr John's sound – and no one makes music like him, writes Dave Simpson”
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Randall Roberts 4/4 100 2012 “This article was originally on a blog post platform and may be missing photos, graphics or links.”
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Mikael Wood A- 91
Paste via Wikipediaby Holly Gleason 9/10 90 2012 “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes 4/5 80 2012 “Check out our album review of Artist's Locked Down on Rolling Stone.com.”
Clash via Wikipediaby John Freeman 8/10 80 2012 “When Dr. John, the master of voodoo blues, was given a Black Keys album by his granddaughter, a pan-generational connection was initiated.”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stephen M. Deusner 7.5/10 75 2012 “Dan Auerbach of the Black Keys produced the New Orleans legend's newest, a weird-ass mix of grotty funk and R&B.”
Consequence via Wikipediaby Adam Kivel 3.5/5 70 2012 “He proves he can still bring the weird.”

More Rock from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply