Machine Dreams

Little Dragon – Machine Dreams: B-Side Breakdown 73 (C) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Machine Dreams by Little Dragon
Released August 17, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Little Dragon

Machine Dreams

73
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 6 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown73Grade: C
Approval50%3 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Machine Dreams an early B-Side Breakdown of 73 (C), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Machine Dreams

3 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.

020406080100Drowned in Sound: 60Spin: 70PopMatters: 70Pitchfork: 77Mojo: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 73
The gist
Mojo via Wikipedia 4/5 80 2009
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Andy Kellman 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Matthew Perpetua 7.7/10 77 2009 “Swedish quartet make dance-oriented electronic-leaning pop that foregrounds ambiance and texture, as Tricky once did so well.”
Spin via Wikipediaby Mosi Reeves 7/10 70 2009 “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: November 03, 2009Label: PeacefrogWith nods to synth pop, electro, and funk, Sweden's Little Dragon fill their second”
PopMatters via Wikipediaby Estella Hung 7/10 70 2009
Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby William Grant 6/10 60 2009 “In a year where La Roux and Little Boots have done their darndest to turn electro-pop into a dirty phrase, Little Dragon offer som”

Machine Dreams in Little Dragon's catalog

75Little Dragon (2007): 8080Machine Dreams (2009): 7373This oneRitual Union (2011): 8080Slugs of Love (2023): 737320072023
Little Dragon's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Little Dragon album, ranked

More from Little Dragon

See all Little Dragon albums ranked

More Electronic from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply