Let the Dominoes Fall

Rancid – Let the Dominoes Fall: B-Side Breakdown 68 (D+) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Let the Dominoes Fall by Rancid
Released June 2, 2009
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Rancid

Let the Dominoes Fall

68
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 6 critics · 33% approval
B-Side Breakdown68Grade: D+
Approval33%2 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 26 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Rancid's best-reviewed album here since Indestructible (2003). Scores ran from 40 (Kerrang!) to 80 (PopMatters).

020406080100Kerrang!: 40Spin: 70AllMusic: 70Rolling Stone: 70PopMatters: 80Spectrum Culture: 80 Breakdown 68
The gist
PopMatters 8/10 80 2009 “Perhaps the best indication of what constitutes a great punk band is its members’ abilities to think beyond the scope of their three-chord impetus.”
Spectrum Culture 4.0/5 80 2009 “Rancid Let The Dominoes Fall Rating: 3.5 Label: Hellcat It has been six long years since Rancid’s last album, and unlike the band’s sound, the world has changed drastically. The…”
Spin via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2009 “We're still around," Tim Armstrong growls over Lars Frederiksen's peppy guitar blitz as these lovable mosh-pit lifers kick off album number seven. The”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70 2009
Rolling Stone via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70
Kerrang! via Wikipedia 2/5 40 2009

More from Rancid

See all Rancid albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2009

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply