Laughing Stock

Talk Talk – Laughing Stock: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 8 critic reviews.

Album cover for Laughing Stock by Talk Talk
Released September 16, 1991
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Talk Talk

Laughing Stock

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 8 critics · 63% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval63%5 of 8 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessContentiousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 50 points of each other

Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 40 to 100.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (NME in 1991) to 100 (Uncut). Talk Talk's best-reviewed album here since Spirit of Eden (1988).

020406080100The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 40NME in 1991: 40NME in 2000: 50Q: 80Select: 80Uncut: 100AllMusic: 100Pitchfork: 100 Breakdown 74
The gist
Uncut via Wikipediaby Graeme Thomson 10/10 100
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Jason Ankeny 5/5 100
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jess Harvell 10/10 100 “These magnificent reissues of English art-rock innovators Talk Talk's 1991 final record Laughing Stock and their reclusive leader Mark Hollis' 1998 self-titled solo album are presented on immaculate vinyl. They…”
Q via Wikipediaby Ian Cranna 4/5 80
Select via Wikipediaby Nick Griffiths 4/5 80
NME in 2000 via Wikipediaby Neil Thomson 5/10 50 2000
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipediaby J. D. Considine 2/5 40 2004
NME in 1991 via Wikipediaby David Quantick 4/10 40 1991

More from Talk Talk

See all Talk Talk albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1991

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply