Early reviews. Critics give City Burials an early B-Side Breakdown of 86 (B), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on City Burials
Most critics loved it: 5 of 6 liked it.
- Highest 100 Metal Temple
- Outlier 60 Distorted Sound, 20 points below the next-lowest score
- Career #2 of Katatonia's 7 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers The fourth best-reviewed Metal & Punk album of 2020 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Temple | 10/10 | 100 | 2020 | “City Burials" is this Swedish Prog bands 11th studio album, among numerous live albums and EP s. It is also their first album in four years, one of which was…” |
| Dead Rhetoric | 9.5/10 | 95 | 2020 | |
| Sonic Perspectivesby David Potts | 9.0/10 | 90 | 2020 | “Sometimes, being too lucky can be a curse. I’ve only been writing reviews for publication for a short time, but I’ve already had the chance to cover some of my…” |
| Toilet ov Hellby Link Leonhart | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2020 | “Under the blinding lights of these ruined cities, we still survive. Come and join us in the celebration of the City Burials, Katatonia’s newest record.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Thom Jurek | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Distorted Soundby Jack Moar | 6/10 | 60 | 2020 | “Jack Moar reviews the brand new album from Swedish progressive doom rockers Katatonia. Read his review of City Burials here on Distorted Sound!” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
City Burials in Katatonia's catalog
How these critics usually treat Katatonia
- Metal Temple Kinder than usual17 points above the other critics here. Usually 1 point above on Katatonia's other albums (4).
- AllMusic About usual for them7 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Katatonia's other albums (4).
More from Katatonia
← Earlier The Fall of Hearts (2016)Later → Sky Void of Stars (2023)
More Metal & Punk from around 2020
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply