Early reviews. Critics give Bivouac an early B-Side Breakdown of 83 (B), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Bivouac
5 of 5 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 AllMusic
- Lowest 75 Spectrum Culture
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Jawbreaker's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Unfun (79).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Fred Thomas | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brandon Stosuy | 8.8/10 | 88 | 2013 | “The 1992 sophomore album from the Bay Area punk trio found them transitioning from the poppier sound of 1990's Unfun to something darker, grittier, more experimental, and even smarter. This…” |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | “Jawbreaker’s second album was a curious beast. Whereas their other three records each had a cohesive sound and identity – the melodic,” |
| MusicHound Rock via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2007 | |
| Spectrum Culture via Wikipediaby Chaz Kangas | 3.75/5 | 75 | 2013 | “[xrr rating=3.75/5]What a difference 20 years makes for proper music fandom etiquette. Today the most beloved underground artists create a tidal wave of momentum for themselves to the point where…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Bivouac in Jawbreaker's catalog
From B-Side Guys
- More on JawbreakerJefferson Pitcher Brings a Lifetime of Debt to Jawbreaker’s “Jet Black”
More from Jawbreaker
More Rock from around 1992
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply