Early reviews. Critics give Cuts & Bruises an early B-Side Breakdown of 74 (C), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Cuts & Bruises
3 of 5 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 80 The Telegraph, NME and Dork
- Lowest 60 The Independent
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Inhaler's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Open Wide (73).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Thomas Smith | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “Their debut arrived as mid-pandemic lifeline to a generation stuck inside. Its noisier, shinier follow-up is similarly affecting” |
| Dork via Wikipediaby Jamie MacMillan | 4/5 | 80 | 2023 | “Cuts & Bruises by Inhaler · released 17th February 2023 · via Polydor Records · 9 tracks · Alternative album profile · plus 20 related Dork coverage items.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray | 7/10 | 70 | 2023 | “There’s an old saying in the music industry that bands get a lifetime to write their debut, and about six months to pen their second. If that’s the case,” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Megan Graye | 3/5 | 60 | 2023 | “There’s no denying Inhaler’s appeal on their second offering ‘Cuts & Bruises’, but some songs don’t quite scratch that itch” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Cuts & Bruises in Inhaler's catalog
More from Inhaler
← Earlier It Won’t Always Be Like This (2021)Later → Open Wide (2025)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2023
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply