Early reviews. Critics give Ihsahn an early B-Side Breakdown of 88 (B+), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Ihsahn
5 of 5 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 100 Metal Temple
- Lowest 80 Kerrang! and Toilet ov Hell
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Ihsahn's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Arktis (87). The fifth best-reviewed album of 2024 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Temple | 10/10 | 100 | 2024 | “For me, the album was like a project in extremes, contrast, and the uncommon chord progressions that define his career. The music touches each extreme, from tender, sweet passages to…” |
| Noizzeby Harry Shiels | 9/10 | 90 | 2024 | “Black metal royalty Ihsahn returns with some of his most ambitious work yet. Creating two separate yet intertwined experiences, one prog metal and one fully orchestral, for one of the…” |
| Distorted Soundby Dan McHugh | 9/10 | 90 | 2024 | “Dan McHugh reviews the new self-titled full-length from the genius Ihsahn. Read his review here on Distorted Sound!” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Nick Ruskell | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “Norwegian black metal legend Ihsahn continues to boldly go where others wouldn’t think to on eighth solo offering…” |
| Toilet ov Hellby Ben Serna-Grey | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “Ihsahn you to check out Ihsahn’s upcoming self-titled album.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Ihsahn in Ihsahn's catalog
More from Ihsahn
More Metal & Punk from around 2024
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply