Welcome Oblivion

How to Destroy Angels – Welcome Oblivion: B-Side Breakdown 66 (D) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for Welcome Oblivion by How to Destroy Angels
Released March 4, 2013
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
How to Destroy Angels

Welcome Oblivion

66
B-Side BreakdownGrade D · 5 critics · 40% approval
B-Side Breakdown66Grade: D
Approval40%2 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Welcome Oblivion an early B-Side Breakdown of 66 (D), from 5 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: 2 of 5 critics liked it.

020406080100Los Angeles Times: 50Consequence: 60Pitchfork: 62NME: 80AllMusic: 80 Breakdown 66
The gist
NME via Wikipediaby Kevin EG Perry 4/5 80 2013 “Trent Reznor often seems more robot than man, like he plugs in and charges up each night instead of sleeping. Luckily, his musical output has proven reliably alive. Following Nine…”
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas 4/5 80
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Grayson Haver Currin 6.2/10 62 2013 “Welcome Oblivion is the debut LP from How to destroy angels, the project of Trent Reznor, his wife, singer Mariqueen Maandig, collaborator Atticus Ross, and visual artist Rob Sheridan. It…”
Consequence via Wikipediaby Justin Gerber 3/5 60 2013 “The Post-Modern Prometheus.”
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Mikael Wood 2.5/5 50 2013 “The cool and collected 'Welcome Oblivion”

More Indie & Alternative from around 2013

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply