Early reviews. Critics give Built to Last an early B-Side Breakdown of 92 (Heavy Rotation), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Built to Last
So far, 3 of 3 critics liked it.
- Highest 100 Metal Temple
- Lowest 86 Louder
- By the numbers The best-reviewed album of HammerFall's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Dominion (85).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metal Temple | 10/10 | 100 | 2016 | “The Templars of Metal are back in the front! Yes, only after two years since "®Evolution", the Swedish quintet HAMMERFALL has returned with their new album, "Built to Last", showing…” |
| Distorted Soundby Alan Faulkner | 9/10 | 90 | 2016 | “Alan Faulkner reviews the latest record from Swedish power metal outfit HammerFall. Read his review of Built To Last here on Distorted Sound!” |
| Louder via Wikipediaby Sebastian Kessler | 6/7 | 86 | 2016 | “Der Krieg um den metallenen Thron geht in die nächste Runde: Scheinen Hammerfall in den letzten Jahren gegen neuere Genre-Gewächse wie Sabaton oder” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Built to Last in HammerFall's catalog
How these critics usually treat HammerFall
- Distorted Sound Kinder than usual3 points below the other critics here. Usually 13 points below on HammerFall's other albums (3).
- Metal Temple About usual for them12 points above the other critics here. Usually 15 points above on HammerFall's other albums (3).
More from HammerFall
More Metal & Punk from around 2016
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply