Early reviews. Critics give Under the Bushes Under the Stars an early B-Side Breakdown of 71 (C-), from 6 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.
The verdict on Under the Bushes Under the Stars
3 of 6 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 88 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 60 Spin, Rolling Stone and AllMusic
- Career Tied for #9 of Guided by Voices's 14 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia | B+ | 88 | 1996 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby John Mulvey | 8/10 | 80 | ||
| Alternative Press via Wikipediaby Noah Slankard | 4/5 | 80 | 2006 | |
| Spin via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | ||
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Michael Corcoran | 3/5 | 60 | 1998 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Under The Bushes Under The Stars on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Under the Bushes Under the Stars in Guided by Voices's catalog
How these critics usually treat Guided by Voices
- NME Kinder than usual10 points above the other critics here. Usually 11 points below on Guided by Voices's other albums (3).
- Rolling Stone Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 1 point below on Guided by Voices's other albums (6).
- Spin Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Guided by Voices's other albums (4).
- AllMusic Harsher than usual14 points below the other critics here. Usually 2 points below on Guided by Voices's other albums (10).
- Entertainment Weekly Kinder than usual20 points above the other critics here. Usually 12 points above on Guided by Voices's other albums (3).
More from Guided by Voices
More Indie & Alternative from around 1996
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.









Leave a Reply