Gigaton

Pearl Jam – Gigaton: B-Side Breakdown 72 (C-) from 7 critic reviews.

Album cover for Gigaton by Pearl Jam
Released March 27, 2020
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Pearl Jam

Gigaton

72
B-Side BreakdownGrade C- · 7 critics · 43% approval
B-Side Breakdown72Grade: C-
Approval43%3 of 7 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 20 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 7 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

020406080100Slant: 60Pitchfork: 62Spill Magazine: 66Paste: 70PopMatters: 80musicOMH: 80Consequence: 88 Breakdown 72
The gist
Consequence B+ 88 “Pearl Jam's 11th studio album offers a message of portent and hope in a time when we desperately need to understand both. Read Matt Melis' full review”
PopMatters 8/10 80 “Gigaton sounds like Pearl Jam convincingly doing their very best to not sound like Pearl Jam.”
musicOMH 4/5 80 “So the first thing you'll have noticed about Pearl Jam's new album, Gigaton, is just how much the first single (Dance Of The Clairvoyants) sounds like”
Paste 7.0/10 70 “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.”
Spill Magazine 6.6/10 66 “Pearl Jam Gigaton Republic Records Grunge legend Pearl Jam has made its long-awaited return with Gigaton, its first album since 2013’s Lightning Bolt and its first taste of new music…”
Pitchfork 6.2/10 62 “Eleven albums in, a band that has become an industry unto itself attempts an artistic rejuvenation that still seems out of reach.”
Slant 3/5 60 “The more the band moves outside their comfort zone, the worthier they become of their apparent permanence.”

More from Pearl Jam

See all Pearl Jam albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2020

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply