Critics give On the Water a B-Side Breakdown of 84 (B), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 70 to 91.
The verdict on On the Water
7 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 91 The A.V. Club
- Lowest 70 Under the Radar
- By the numbers The eighth best-reviewed album of 2011 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Saloni Gajjar | A- | 91 | 2022 | “The A.V. Club digs deep into film, TV, music, games, books and more.” |
| Tiny Mix Tapes via Wikipediaby J Arthur Bloom | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2011 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Corey Beasley | 9/10 | 90 | 2011 | “Future Islands have been poised at the edge of something big for a while now. The Baltimore-based trio made serious waves with 2010’s In Evening Air, a” |
| Paste via Wikipediaby Carey Hodges | 8.9/10 | 89 | 2011 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Siobhán Kane | B | 85 | 2011 | “Future Islands remain dreamy, romantic, and melancholic…” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Neil Ashman | 8/10 | 80 | 2011 | “If you can learn to love that voice On the Water is surely one of the most unconventionally beautiful records of the year.” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Lindsay Zoladz | 7.7/10 | 77 | 2011 | “The Baltimore synth-romantics' third album is invested in wide-open spaces. Though less intent on bringing drama or fury than last year's In Evening Air, its reflections on aging and memory…” |
| Under the Radar via Wikipediaby John Everhart | 7/10 | 70 | 2011 | “Future Islands' second album In Evening Air neatly sidesteps the clichéd sophomore slump via a quantum leap in sheer songwriting erudition and heightened band cohesiveness.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Indie & Alternative from around 2011
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply