Shakara

Fela Kuti – Shakara: B-Side Breakdown 76 (C) from 3 critic reviews.

Album cover for Shakara by Fela Kuti
Released 1972
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Fela Kuti

Shakara

76
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 3 critics · 67% approval
B-Side Breakdown76Grade: C
Approval67%2 of 3 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give Shakara an early B-Side Breakdown of 76 (C), from 3 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on Shakara

So far, 2 of 3 critics liked it.

020406080100Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 60Pitchfork: 78AllMusic: 90 Breakdown 76
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Aaron Leitko 7.8/10 78 2014 “Fela: Vinyl Box Set 3 collects seven recently reissued Fela Kuti LPs selected by Brian Eno, one of Kuti's most eloquently spoken champions. There are really no bad Fela Kuti…”
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipediaby Colin Larkin 3/5 60 2014

Shakara in Fela Kuti's catalog

75Shakara (1972): 7676This oneExpensive Shit (1975): 7373Zombie (1976): 8787No Agreement (1977): 8282Shuffering and Shmiling (1978): 83831978
Fela Kuti's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Fela Kuti album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Fela Kuti

  • AllMusic About usual for them21 points above the other critics here. Usually 16 points above on Fela Kuti's other albums (4).

More from Fela Kuti

See all Fela Kuti albums ranked

More Jazz from around 1972

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply