Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost: Part 1

Foals – Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost: Part 1: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost: Part 1 by Foals
Released March 8, 2019
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Foals

Everything Not Saved Will Be Lost: Part 1

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 9 critics · 44% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval44%4 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 32 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.

By the numbers: Foals's best-reviewed album here since What Went Down (2015). Scores ran from 50 (Rolling Stone) to 100 (NME).

020406080100Rolling Stone: 50Mojo: 60Pitchfork: 60Uncut: 70AllMusic: 70Q: 80The Guardian: 80NME: 100The Independent: 100 Breakdown 74
NME via Wikipediaby Tom Connick 5/5 100
The Independent via Wikipediaby Mark Beaumont 5/5 100
Q via Wikipediaby Tom Doyle 4/5 80
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Dave Simpson 4/5 80
Uncut via Wikipediaby Daniel Dylan Wray 7/10 70
AllMusic via Wikipediaby James Christopher Monger 3.5/5 70
Mojo via Wikipediaby Stephen Worthy 3/5 60
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen 6.0/10 60
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Will Hermes 2.5/5 50

More from Foals

See all Foals albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2019

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply