Based on 8 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 30 to 100.
By the numbers: A Perfect Circle's best-reviewed album here since Thirteenth Step (2003). Scores ran from 30 (Spin) to 100 (Kerrang!).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerrang! via Wikipedia | 5/5 | 100 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | B- | 81 | 2018 | |
| Sputnikmusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | “A Perfect Circle – Eat the Elephant review: A Perfect Circle drop their long-awaited fourth album, a cohesive and atmospheric rock record with ambitious lyrical themes and a superb vocal…” | |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Nick Hasted | 4/5 | 80 | 2018 | “In this week's roundup, Tim Burgess' new album proves impulsively replayable, while Alexis Taylor makes a statement in human authenticity” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Calum Slingerland | 6/10 | 60 | 2018 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Zoe Camp | 4.9/10 | 49 | 2018 | “On their first album in 14 years, art-metal giants Maynard James Keenan and Billy Howerdel swerve unexpectedly toward gloomy adult-alternative.” |
| Spin via Wikipediaby Ian Cohen | 3/10 | 30 | 2018 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from A Perfect Circle
More Indie & Alternative from around 2018
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.







Leave a Reply