Divinely Uninspired to a Hellish Extent

Lewis Capaldi – Divinely Uninspired to a Hellish Extent: B-Side Breakdown 63 (D) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for Divinely Uninspired to a Hellish Extent by Lewis Capaldi
Released May 17, 2019
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Lewis Capaldi

Divinely Uninspired to a Hellish Extent

63
B-Side BreakdownGrade D · 6 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown63Grade: D
Approval50%3 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 36 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Lewis Capaldi's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of Broken by Desire to Be Heavenly Sent (60). Scores ran from 40 (Clash) to 80 (Q).

020406080100NME: 40Clash: 40The Guardian: 60Q: 80The Independent: 80The Line of Best Fit: 80 Breakdown 63
The gist
Q via Wikipediaby John Aizlewood 4/5 80 2019
The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor 4/5 80 2019 “22-year-old’s debut might be uninspired, but what it lacks in originality it makes up for in talent”
The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Hayley Milross 8/10 80 2019 “The Scottish troubadour delivers a solid debut LP that will further ingratiate him to his legions of fans”
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Ben Beaumont-Thomas 3/5 60 2019 “Singing dolorous ballads in a style that makes Adele look stoic takes some doing, but Capaldi’s honesty is appealing”
NME via Wikipediaby Jordan Bassett 2/5 40 2019 “The likeable Scottish pop don turns in an album of emotional piano ballads on which his voice has more gravel than a branch of B&Q”
Clash via Wikipediaby Robin Murray 4/10 40 2019 “Lewis Capaldi is one of the good guys. He’s hilarious on social media, even funnier in person, and supplies our preening, posing, media-trained”

More from Lewis Capaldi

See all Lewis Capaldi albums ranked

More Pop from around 2019

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply