Critics give If You Leave a B-Side Breakdown of 73 (Keeper), from 12 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.
The verdict on If You Leave
Critics split on this one: scores run from 50 (NME) to 100 (musicOMH).
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMHby Sam Shepherd | 5/5 | 100 | 2013 | “Some albums are almost too painful to listen to. When an artist pours every ounce of their soul and being into their music the result can be thrilling,” |
| The Line of Best Fitby Christian Cottingham | 9.5/10 | 95 | 2013 | “If You Leave is staggeringly beautiful from beginning to close, a catharsis that’s both bracing and woozily amniotic.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia | 9/10 | 90 | 2013 | “An album as beautifully conceived as If You Leave is one you follow from start to finish, riveted by the story it weaves and the emotion it bleeds.” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Tony Hardy | 4/5 | 80 | 2013 | |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Robin Smith | 7/10 | 70 | 2013 | “Elena Tonra talks about living in negation of everything else. “Underneath the skin there's a human / Buried deep within there's a human / And despite” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| DIYby Gareth Ware | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | |
| Uncut via Wikipedia | 6/10 | 60 | 2013 | |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Maddy Costa | 3/5 | 60 | 2013 | “Daughter's songs are atmospheric, but feel calculatedly so and suffocating, writes Maddy Costa” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Kevin EG Perry | 5/10 | 50 | 2013 | “Would you let a daughter of yours out of the house like this? Draped in mourning weeds, pallid and sad? It’s a get-up that’s certainly drawn plenty of welcome attention…” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
If You Leave in Daughter's catalog
More from Daughter
More Indie & Alternative from around 2013
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.





Leave a Reply