Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water

Limp Bizkit – Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water: B-Side Breakdown 69 (D+) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water by Limp Bizkit
Released October 14, 2000
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Limp Bizkit

Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water

69
B-Side BreakdownGrade D+ · 9 critics · 33% approval
B-Side Breakdown69Grade: D+
Approval33%3 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 32 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 50 to 100.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 50 (AllMusic) to 100 (The Telegraph).

020406080100AllMusic: 50RapReviews: 55NME: 60Q: 60The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 60Spin: 70Entertainment Weekly: 75Melody Maker: 90The Telegraph: 100 Breakdown 69
The Telegraph via Wikipedia 5/5 100
Melody Maker via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipedia C 75
Spin via Wikipedia 7/10 70
NME via Wikipedia 6/10 60
Q via Wikipedia 3/5 60
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipedia 3/5 60
RapReviews 5.5/10 55 2023
AllMusic via Wikipedia 2.5/5 50

More from Limp Bizkit

See all Limp Bizkit albums ranked

More Metal & Punk from around 2000

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply