Critics give Abyss a B-Side Breakdown of 75 (Keeper), from 8 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 59 to 81.
The verdict on Abyss
7 of 8 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 81 Pitchfork
- Lowest 59 The A.V. Club
- Career #4 of Chelsea Wolfe's 5 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Brandon Stosuy | 8.1/10 | 81 | 2015 | “Chelsea Wolfe plays folk music but counts plenty of metalheads among her fans. Abyss, her heaviest (and best) collection to date, was produced by John Congleton. Featuring more musicians and…” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby Jason Anderson | 8/10 | 80 | 2015 | |
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Sue Matiz | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | “The rise of US singer-songwriter Chelsea Wolfe from obscure enigma to… well, a much better-known enigma, has been quite dramatic, if not” |
| Mojo via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2015 | |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Spin via Wikipediaby Harley Brown | 7/10 | 70 | 2015 | “7SPIN Rating: 7 of 10Release Date: August 07, 2015Label: Sargent HouseBetween references to the River Styx, lamentations of psychic emptiness, and the” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Sophie Weiner | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2015 | “Check out our album review of Artist's Abyss on Rolling Stone.com.” |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Alex McLevy | B- | 59 | 2015 | “Chelsea Wolfe balances the bombast with the beautiful on Abyss” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
Abyss in Chelsea Wolfe's catalog
How these critics usually treat Chelsea Wolfe
- AllMusic About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Chelsea Wolfe's other albums (4).
- Pitchfork About usual for them7 points above the other critics here. Usually 4 points above on Chelsea Wolfe's other albums (4).
More from Chelsea Wolfe
← Earlier Pain Is Beauty (2013)Later → She Reaches Out to She Reaches Out to She (2024)
More Indie & Alternative from around 2015
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply