Centipede Hz

Animal Collective – Centipede Hz: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Centipede Hz by Animal Collective
Released August 29, 2012
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Animal Collective

Centipede Hz

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 10 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval50%5 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 16 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 85.

By the numbers: 5 of 10 critics liked it.

020406080100The Guardian: 60Los Angeles Times: 63Rolling Stone: 70AllMusic: 70Pitchfork: 74The A.V. Club: 78Spin: 80NME: 80Q: 80Entertainment Weekly: 85 Breakdown 74
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Darren Franich B 85
Spin via Wikipediaby Nick Murray 8/10 80 2012
NME via Wikipediaby Barry Nicolson 8/10 80 2012
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Marc Hirsh C+ 78 2012
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Stuart Berman 7.4/10 74 2012
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan 3.5/5 70 2012
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Fred Thomas 3.5/5 70
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Mikael Wood 2.5/4 63 2012
The Guardian via Wikipediaby Tom Ewing 3/5 60 2012

More from Animal Collective

See all Animal Collective albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2012

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply