The Science of Things

Bush – The Science of Things: B-Side Breakdown 56 (F) from 4 critic reviews.

Album cover for The Science of Things by Bush
Released October 26, 1999
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Bush

The Science of Things

56
B-Side BreakdownGrade F · 4 critics · 0% approval
B-Side Breakdown56Grade: F
Approval0%0 of 4 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 24 points of each other

Early reviews. Critics give The Science of Things an early B-Side Breakdown of 56 (F), from 4 reviews so far. It will settle as more outlets weigh in.

The verdict on The Science of Things

So far, 0 of 4 critics liked it.

  • Highest 70 AllMusic
  • Lowest 40 Rolling Stone
  • By the numbers The best-reviewed album of Bush's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of The Sea of Memories (55).
020406080100Rolling Stone: 40NME: 50Entertainment Weekly: 65AllMusic: 70 Breakdown 56
The gist
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas 3.5/5 70
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Rob Brunner D 65 1999
NME via Wikipedia 2.5/5 50 2005 “Friends, Romans, indie kids, lend me your ears. I come to praise Bush. A bit. Not to bury them. Totally. ‘Cos some of this record rocks. It really does. Oh…”
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Karen Schoemer 2/5 40 1999

The Science of Things in Bush's catalog

75Razorblade Suitcase (1996): 5151The Science of Things (1999): 5656This oneThe Sea of Memories (2011): 5555Black and White Rainbows (2017): 434319962017
Bush's albums by B-Side Breakdown, in release order. Above the dashed line, most critics liked it. Every Bush album, ranked

How these critics usually treat Bush

  • AllMusic About usual for them18 points above the other critics here. Usually 14 points above on Bush's other albums (3).

More from Bush

See all Bush albums ranked

More Rock from around 1999

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem


Discover more from B-Side Guys

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Tags:

Leave a Reply