Blood Sugar Sex Magik

Red Hot Chili Peppers – Blood Sugar Sex Magik: B-Side Breakdown 84 (B) from 10 critic reviews.

Album cover for Blood Sugar Sex Magik by Red Hot Chili Peppers
Released September 24, 1991
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Red Hot Chili Peppers

Blood Sugar Sex Magik

84
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 10 critics · 90% approval
B-Side Breakdown84Grade: B
Approval90%9 of 10 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 18 points of each other

Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 71 to 100.

By the numbers: The best-reviewed album of Red Hot Chili Peppers's career on B-Side Breakdowns, ahead of By the Way (83). 9 of 10 critics liked it, with Pitchfork the lone holdout at 71.

020406080100Pitchfork: 71Los Angeles Times: 75Rolling Stone: 80Select: 80Spin Alternative Record Guide: 80Q: 80Entertainment Weekly: 81NME: 90Mojo: 100AllMusic: 100 Breakdown 84
The gist
Mojo via Wikipediaby Dan Eccleston 5/5 100 2003
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Steve Huey 5/5 100
NME via Wikipediaby Steven Wells 9/10 90
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Bill Wyman B- 81
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Tom Moon 4/5 80 2003 “Check out our album review of Artist's Blood Sugar Sex Magik on Rolling Stone.com.”
Select via Wikipediaby Andrew Perry 4/5 80 2003
Spin Alternative Record Guide via Wikipediaby Bob Mack 8/10 80 2003
Q via Wikipediaby Peter Kane 4/5 80 2003
Los Angeles Times via Wikipediaby Steve Hochman 3/4 75 1991
Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jeremy Gordon 7.1/10 71 2016 “On their 1991 breakthrough album, the Red Hot Chili Peppers were the partially-clothed id, barreling toward the funk and stumbling across inclusiveness along the way.”

More from Red Hot Chili Peppers

See all Red Hot Chili Peppers albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 1991

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply