Critics give Gone Now a B-Side Breakdown of 73 (C), from 10 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 91.
The verdict on Gone Now
4 of 10 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 91 Entertainment Weekly
- Lowest 60 Q
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby Jonathan Brenstein | A- | 91 | 2017 | |
| The A.V. Club via Wikipediaby Gwen Ihnat | B- | 81 | 2017 | |
| NME via Wikipediaby Jamie Milton | 4/5 | 80 | 2017 | “After working with Taylor Swift and Lorde, pop mastermind Jack Antonoff makes a big statement of his own.” |
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Heather Phares | 4/5 | 80 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Matt Melis | C- | 71 | 2017 | “Jack Antonoff's sophomore effort serves up too much sugar and not enough substance.” |
| Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Jon Dolan | 3.5/5 | 70 | 2017 | “Our take on the second album from the tune machine.” |
| PopMatters via Wikipediaby Ethan King | 7/10 | 70 | 2017 | “With Bleachers’ debut Strange Desire, Grammy Award-winner Jack Antonoff capitalized on the '80s nostalgia pop market he helped cultivate through his work with” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Cam Lindsay | 7/10 | 70 | 2017 | |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Sam Sodomsky | 6.1/10 | 61 | 2017 | “Jack Antonoff’s stately sophomore effort as Bleachers has all the affectations of an over-the-top pop masterpiece, with some soaring anthems. But it’s a largely uneven album.” |
| Q via Wikipediaby Kate Solomon | 3/5 | 60 | 2017 |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More Indie & Alternative from around 2017
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply