Blank Generation

Richard Hell and the Voidoids – Blank Generation: B-Side Breakdown 84 (B) from 9 critic reviews.

Album cover for Blank Generation by Richard Hell and the Voidoids
Released September 1977
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Richard Hell and the Voidoids

Blank Generation

84
B-Side BreakdownGrade B · 9 critics · 100% approval
B-Side Breakdown84Grade: B
Approval100%9 of 9 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessUnanimousHow close the scores are: most critics land within 10 points of each other

Based on 9 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 80 to 90.

By the numbers: All 9 critics liked it, and the lowest score was 80, from Melody Maker. Critics barely disagreed: every score fell between 80 and 90.

020406080100Mojo: 80Q: 80Select: 80Spin Alternative Record Guide: 80Melody Maker: 80The Rolling Stone Album Guide: 90Uncut: 90AllMusic: 90Louder: 90 Breakdown 84
The gist
The Rolling Stone Album Guide via Wikipedia 4.5/5 90 “Previously published as: Rolling Stone album guide”
Uncut via Wikipediaby Allan Jones 9/10 90
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Mark Deming 4.5/5 90
Louder via Wikipediaby Ian Fortnam 9/10 90
Mojo via Wikipediaby Stevie Chick 4/5 80
Q via Wikipedia 4/5 80
Select via Wikipediaby Richard Norris 4/5 80
Spin Alternative Record Guide via Wikipedia 8/10 80
Melody Maker via Wikipedia 4/5 80

More Metal & Punk from around 1977

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply