Critics give I Forget Where We Were a B-Side Breakdown of 75 (Keeper), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 55 to 90.
The verdict on I Forget Where We Were
8 of 9 critics liked it, and they mostly agree.
- Highest 90 musicOMH
- Lowest 55 Consequence
- Career #3 of Ben Howard's 5 albums with a Breakdown
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| musicOMH via Wikipediaby Graeme Marsh | 4.5/5 | 90 | 2014 | “Balls. 27-year-old singer-songwriter Ben Howard certainly has a pair of balls. After the unexpected success of 2011’s acoustic heavy debut Every Kingdom” |
| The Telegraph via Wikipediaby Neil McCormick | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Michael Hann | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “Ben Howard has hitherto seemed to be firmly at the mellow, safe end of indie-folk, but his new album goes to some intriguing new places, writes Michael Hann” |
| Q via Wikipedia | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Henry Boon | 4/5 | 80 | 2014 | “A sensitive and technically more profound outing.” |
| Drowned in Sound via Wikipediaby Lucas Fothergill | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | “Look at that album artwork; the guy couldn’t give a shit. And that makes him all the more intriguing as an artist.” |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Christian Cottingham | 7/10 | 70 | 2014 | “Ben Howard – I Forget Where We Were. A familiar mesh of earnest words and slow builds…” |
| AllMusic via Wikipedia | 3.5/5 | 70 | ||
| Consequence via Wikipediaby Tony Hardy | C+ | 55 | 2014 | “BRIT award winner's skillful delivery helps him keep a tight hold on melody.” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
I Forget Where We Were in Ben Howard's catalog
How these critics usually treat Ben Howard
- DIY About usual for them6 points above the other critics here. Usually 8 points above on Ben Howard's other albums (3).
More from Ben Howard
More Folk, Country & Americana from around 2014
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59) and averaged. A letter grade counts as the star rating it matches across thousands of reviews of the same albums, so a B+ is 75, like four stars, and a B is 65. Verdicts: Heavy Rotation is 85 and up, Keeper 70–84, Mixed Bag 55–69, Back of the Crate below 55. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 70 or higher (7/10, three and a half stars); the Breakdown shows green at 70 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.








Leave a Reply