Critics give For Those That Wish to Exist a B-Side Breakdown of 80 (B-), from 9 reviews at outlets we track. Scores run 60 to 100.
The verdict on For Those That Wish to Exist
6 of 9 critics liked it. A mixed reception.
- Highest 100 Kerrang!
- Lowest 60 The Guardian
- Career #3 of Architects's 3 albums with a Breakdown
- By the numbers Architects's best-reviewed album here since Holy Hell (Architects album) (2018). The fifth best-reviewed Metal & Punk album of 2021 we've tracked.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Paul Travers | 5/5 | 100 | 2021 | |
| Clash via Wikipediaby Josh Abraham | 9/10 | 90 | 2021 | “Three years after their last album, ‘Holy Hell’, the Brighton metalcore band have risen from the pain of having laid bare the emotions of” |
| Distorted Sound via Wikipediaby James Weaver | 9/10 | 90 | 2021 | “James Weaver reviews the brand new album from Architects. Read his review of 'For Those That Wish To Exist' here on Distorted Sound!” |
| NME via Wikipediaby Dannii Leivers | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “The Brighton's band ninth album is, improbably, a fresh start with a cleaner sonic palette and orchestral flourishes” |
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Roisin O'Connor | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “On their ninth album, Architects offer one of their most melodic and beautifully crafted works yet, while Alice Cooper proves every bit as durable as the city he’s paying homage…” |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Joe Goggins | 4/5 | 80 | 2021 | “The bleaker things get, the stronger they emerge.” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Sophia Simon-Bashall | 7/10 | 70 | 2021 | “For album nine Architects make an uncompromising move filled with exploration” |
| Exclaim! via Wikipediaby Max Heilman | 7/10 | 70 | 2021 | “Your daily dose of the best music, film and comedy news, reviews, streams, concert listings, interviews and other exclusives on Exclaim!” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Rachel Aroesti | 3/5 | 60 | 2021 | “Cobweb-blasting singing, brain-invading melodies and skin-scouring riffs offer no relief from this wrestling match with impending disaster” |
Every Sunday: the week's new albums, scored by the critics. Plus our own reviews when we post them. Free, and one click to leave.
More from Architects
More Metal & Punk from around 2021
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.






Leave a Reply