14 Shots to the Dome

LL Cool J – 14 Shots to the Dome: B-Side Breakdown 62 (D-) from 5 critic reviews.

Album cover for 14 Shots to the Dome by LL Cool J
Released March 30, 1993
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
LL Cool J

14 Shots to the Dome

62
B-Side BreakdownGrade D- · 5 critics · 20% approval
B-Side Breakdown62Grade: D-
Approval20%1 of 5 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessDividedHow close the scores are: most critics land within 36 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 5 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: Scores ran from 40 (Rolling Stone) to 95 (Entertainment Weekly). Only one of 5 critics liked it: Entertainment Weekly, at 95.

020406080100Rolling Stone: 40RapReviews: 55The Source: 60AllMusic: 60Entertainment Weekly: 95 Breakdown 62
The gist
Entertainment Weekly via Wikipediaby David Browne A 95
The Source via Wikipediaby Minya "Shortie" Oh 3/5 60
AllMusic via Wikipediaby Stephen Thomas Erlewine 3/5 60
RapReviews 5.5/10 55 2017
Rolling Stone via Wikipediaby Touré Neblett 2/5 40 “Check out our album review of L.L. Cool J's 14 Shots To The Dome by writer Toure.”

More from LL Cool J

See all LL Cool J albums ranked

More Hip-Hop & Rap from around 1993

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply