Based on 10 reviews from outlets we track. Scores run 67 to 100.
By the numbers: Gorillaz's best-reviewed album here since Plastic Beach (2010). The sixth best-reviewed album of 2026 we've tracked so far.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Independent via Wikipediaby Helen Brown | 5/5 | 100 | Mar 4, 2026 | “The album’s posthumous contributors remind us that music can keep ghosts alive and – by spinning outtake samples of vanished voices into new forms – even serve as a kind…” |
| Uncut via Wikipediaby John Lewis | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| AllMusic via Wikipediaby Neil Z. Yeung | 4.5/5 | 90 | ||
| Record Collector via Wikipediaby Peter Barry | 4/5 | 80 | Jan 26, 2026 | “Are “demon days” here again? With its Dennis Hopper-featuring opener, the ninth Gorillaz album recalls Fire Coming Out Of The Monkey’s Head, the cherished” |
| Slant via Wikipediaby Lewie Parkinson-Jones | 4/5 | 80 | Feb 23, 2026 | “The album is exemplary of the ways in which art can be used to exorcise grief.” |
| The Line of Best Fit via Wikipediaby Janne Oinonen | 8/10 | 80 | Feb 25, 2026 | “The most substantial and satisfying Gorillaz album in ten years, The Mountain feels deeper and more emotionally resonant than any of its predecessors.” |
| Mojo via Wikipediaby Tom Doyle | 4/5 | 80 | Sep 9, 2025 | |
| DIY via Wikipediaby Sean Kerwick | 4/5 | 80 | Feb 25, 2026 | “Gorillaz are really going for it.” |
| The Guardian via Wikipediaby Alexis Petridis | 4/5 | 80 | Feb 26, 2026 | “Damon Albarn and Jamie Hewlett’s cartoon band mark 25 years with an album inspired by India and shaped by loss, featuring collaborators living and dead” |
| Pitchfork via Wikipediaby Jazz Monroe | 6.7/10 | 67 | Feb 27, 2026 |
From B-Side Guys
More from Gorillaz
More Pop from around 2026
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.










Leave a Reply