(A) Senile Animal

Melvins – (A) Senile Animal: B-Side Breakdown 74 (C) from 6 critic reviews.

Album cover for (A) Senile Animal by Melvins
Released October 10, 2006
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Melvins

(A) Senile Animal

74
B-Side BreakdownGrade C · 6 critics · 50% approval
B-Side Breakdown74Grade: C
Approval50%3 of 6 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessBroad agreementHow close the scores are: most critics land within 14 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: 3 of 6 critics liked it.

020406080100Encyclopedia of Popular Music: 60AllMusic: 70Pitchfork: 73PopMatters: 80Drowned in Sound: 80Stylus Magazine: 81 Breakdown 74
The gist
Stylus Magazine via Wikipedia B- 81
PopMatters via Wikipedia 8/10 80 “With considerable confidence, it can be assumed that the following name has never appeared in any review of a Melvins recording: Woody Allen. Perhaps because,”
Drowned in Sound via Wikipedia 8/10 80 “How wonderfully appropriate an album title for the woolly mammoths of sludgy, seedy, grainy, gaudy, rolly, polly, stingy, syrup-y metal that keeps…”
Pitchfork via Wikipedia 7.3/10 73 “King Buzzo and Dale Crover team with the members of bass/drums duo Big Business and return to the Melvins' classic stoner metal sound.”
AllMusic via Wikipedia 3.5/5 70
Encyclopedia of Popular Music via Wikipedia 3/5 60

More Rock from around 2006

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply