- Artist
- Liam Gallagher
- Album
- Why Me? Why Not.
Early reviews. Based on 5 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.
| The gist | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Consequence | B | 85 | “The former Oasis frontman learns to recognize his limits and trust his instincts on his sophomore effort. Read Meghan Roos' full review” |
| Clash | 8/10 | 80 | “” |
| PopMatters | 7/10 | 70 | “When watching Charlie Lightening's fascinating documentary, As It Was, that details Liam Gallagher's journey from the rock 'n' roll wilderness to rejuvenated,” |
| Paste | 6.9/10 | 69 | “Paste Magazine is your source for the best music, movies, TV, comedy, videogames, books, comics, craft beer, politics and more. Discover your favorite albums and films.” |
| Pitchfork | 6.3/10 | 63 | “The former Oasis frontman’s second solo album is pitched as a re-introduction, but forward motion—whether musical or personal—remains foreign to him.” |
More from Liam Gallagher
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Critics who liked it is the share of outlets that scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not whether critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number.
Leave a Reply