Wasting Light

Foo Fighters – Wasting Light: B-Side Breakdown 78 (C+) from 4 critic reviews.

Album cover for Wasting Light by Foo Fighters
Released April 8, 2011
Shop on AmazonAs an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Foo Fighters

Wasting Light

78
B-Side BreakdownGrade C+ · 4 critics · 75% approval
B-Side Breakdown78Grade: C+
Approval75%3 of 4 critics scored it 75 or higher
DivisivenessSome debateHow close the scores are: most critics land within 22 points of each other

Early reviews. Based on 4 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.

By the numbers: 3 of 4 critics liked it, with Slant the lone holdout at 60.

020406080100Slant: 60PopMatters: 80Beats Per Minute: 81musicOMH: 90 Breakdown 78
The gist
musicOMH 4.5/5 90 “Rock is back, and it's about fucking time. Wasting Light is exactly the kick-start needed to jolt the genre back to life in an era when hairstyles lead to”
Beats Per Minute 81% 81 “Music News, Reviews, Interviews, Videos and MP3s”
PopMatters 8/10 80 “Wasting Light is the best Foo Fighters album in a good long while. One by One has its defenders, but this is probably the best thing they’ve done since The”
Slant 3/5 60 “The additions of Vig, Smear, and Novoselic end up doing little except reminding listeners of better days.”

More from Foo Fighters

See all Foo Fighters albums ranked

More Indie & Alternative from around 2011

Would you spin it again?

Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.

How the Breakdown works

Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.

A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 85 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.

Report a problem

Tags:

Leave a Reply