Early reviews. Based on 6 critics so far. The Breakdown will settle as more outlets weigh in.
By the numbers: 5 of 6 critics liked it, with PopMatters the lone holdout at 70. Critics barely disagreed: every score fell between 70 and 80.
| The gist | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Louder via Wikipediaby Damian Jones | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “The Mandrake Project is a bold return for Iron Maiden frontman Bruce Dickinson” |
| Kerrang! via Wikipediaby Nick Ruskell | 4/5 | 80 | 2024 | “Hear the Mandrake scream! Iron Maiden’s Bruce Dickinson unveils his most ambitious and best solo work to date on seventh extracurricular offering…” |
| Sonic Perspectives | 8.0/10 | 80 | “1984 is generally regarded as the greatest year in metal. The release of Iron Maiden’s “Powerslave,” Dio’s “The Last In Line,” Judas Priest’s “Defenders of The Faith,” Saxon‘s “Crusader” are…” | |
| Distorted Sound | 8/10 | 80 | “Elliot Leaver reviews the new solo album from Iron Maiden frontman Bruce Dickinson!” | |
| Spectrum Culture | 79/100 | 79 | “Bruce Dickinson’s seventh solo album features some of his best work to date but forms an overpowering and slightly claustrophobic whole.” | |
| PopMatters | 7/10 | 70 | “Iron Maiden singer Bruce Dickinson overcomes creative and personal struggles on his first solo album in 19 years, The Mandrake Project.” |
More Metal & Punk from around 2024
Would you spin it again?
Be the first to answer. Results show once 3 listeners weigh in.
How the Breakdown works
Every outlet’s score is converted to 0–100 (2/5 is 40, 5.9/10 is 59, a B+ is 88) and averaged. Grades follow the B-Side scale: A is 90–100, B 80–89, C 70–79, D 60–69, F below 60. Approval is the share of critics who scored it 75 or higher; the Breakdown shows green at 75 and up, red below. Divisiveness asks a different question: not how many critics liked it, but how close their scores are to each other. Five critics who all give it 50 are Unanimous, even though none of them liked it. The labels run Unanimous, Broad agreement, Some debate, Divided, and Contentious. Replay rate comes from listeners, not critics: yes counts fully, a few tracks counts half, no counts zero. The gist quotes each outlet’s own summary of its review. Published is the date on the review itself, read from the outlet’s page, so you can see whether an album’s reputation came at release or years later. Scores marked est. come from reviews that publish no number. Scores marked via Wikipedia are archive ratings, mostly for older albums, taken from the “Professional ratings” box on the album’s Wikipedia page (published openly through Wikidata); each links to the original review when we can find it online, and to that Wikipedia entry when we can’t. When an outlet reviewed an album twice, years apart (often for a reissue), both scores count, each labeled with its year.
A-Side marks the critics’ top tier. An album earns it automatically, from its numbers alone: a Breakdown of 90 or higher, from at least 5 reviews, with at least 75% approval. Nobody hands it out and nobody can buy it; if new reviews pull an album below the line, it loses the badge.




Leave a Reply